Skip to main content
9:00 pm
and that wouldn't have happened if they hadn't been treated. so you don't treat -- you don't learn how to cure something by not treating it. you treat it and i think that could have been the case here. >> again, thank you for telling the world about kyler and us, too. >> thank you so much for having me. >> that's september 7th the 2,786th day since president bush declared mission in iraq. and the 141st day of the deepwater horizon disaster in the gulf. i'm keith olbermann. good night and good luck. and now to discuss why republicans aren't endorsing other republicans ladies and gentlemen here is rachel maddow. good evening. thank you. and thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. happy day after labor day, everybody. as the day after labor day, today is officially two things. it is the first day on which it is no longer okay to wear white. i'm talking to you. yes, i can see you. it's also this. >> unofficial end of summer
9:01 pm
means the 2010 campaign season is now in full swing. >> campaign season kicking into high gear today with the arrival of labor day. >> labor day typically marks the unofficial kickoff of the mid-term campaign season. >> labor day of course signals the official start of the campaign season. >> welcome to the beginning of the fall campaign season. >> i do not know why it is true but it is always true. in any election year no matter what else has happened all year long for some reason labor day or the day after labor day is when everybody agrees that the campaign season is in top gear. and this is not one of those things where because it's the common wisdom i'm going to say it's not true. it actually is true. all you have to do to verify it is to look at the president's schedule these days, to know that the campaign season is in top gear. you don't even have to close your eyes and imagine campaign obama. obama the campaigner is definitely back. >> i am going to keep fighting every single day, every single
9:02 pm
hour, every single minute to turn this economy around and put people back to work and renew the american dream, not just for your family, not just for all of our families, but for future generations. that i can guarantee you. that's why, milwaukee, today i am announcing a new plan for rebuilding and modernizing america's roads and rails and runways for the long term. i want america to have the best infrastructure in the world. >> ooh the sexiest word in american public policy -- infrastructure. as the economy continues to be not only the biggest issue in the country but also the democratic party's biggest liability heading into the elections, eight weeks from today, expect to hear a lot more about infrastructure. expect to hear a lot more of president obama the campaigner talking infrastructure, talking economy, talking jobs.
9:03 pm
economy, jobs, economy, jobs, economy, jobs. that's what we're going to hear. when it comes to what options the government has to try to bring down unemployment, nothing is a perfect solution but spending money to rebuild american infrastructure is an unout sourceable, uncontroversial thing. even republicans are in favor of infrastructure spending. remember back during the stimulus debate they claim to have wanted more of it. >> we do need more money on infrastructure spending. >> we need more on the infrastructure. we need more on infrastructure. >> there is 7% of this on infrastructure. out of $825 billion. we have an opportunity to double the amount of infrastructure money. >> we had an $825 billion bill, about $90 billion was for infrastructure. this was not a stimulus bill, just a tiny portion of it was. >> we can disagree on other things but democrats and republicans can get together and say, if there's one thing we agree on with the spending package, it is for simple infrastructure. >> if there's one thing we can
9:04 pm
agree on it's for infrastructure. amen to that, right? everybody agrees. so naturally after president obama came out and proposed some infrastructure spending yesterday, the republican leadership came out and now they're totally against it. yeah. according to house minority leader john boehner, quote, the white house has chosen to double down on more of the same, quote, stimulus spending. senate minority leader mitch mcconnell slammed the proposal as, quote, a last minute cobbled together stimulus bill that will not reverse the complete lack of confidence americans have in washington democrats' ability to help this economy. so much for infrastructure spending being the one thing we agree on. they all agreed on it until president obama proposed some of it and then they said they are against it. how can you say you are for spending on infrastructure and then decide you are against it once it has actually been proposed? what's next? what's next? republicans coming out against tax cuts?
9:05 pm
yes. tomorrow president obama is set to announce $300 billion worth of corporate tax cuts, tax cuts of the exact variety that republicans are on record being in favor of. the biggest piece of this proposal was a $200 billion tax cut for companies to write off any investment in new plants and equipment. if you own a business you can just deduct anything you spend on stuff like that from your taxes. now, this is not exactly an original idea. this has been done before and it has been done by republicans. in 2002 the republican controlled congress then passed legislation to allow companies to write off 30% of their investments in equipment. in 2003 republicans raised that to 50% of equipment purchases. right now four senate republicans led by chuck grassley are cosponsoring legislation to renew that to allow companies to write off 50% of their equipment purchases. president obama is about to propose tomorrow upping that to 100%, more than republicans ever dreamed of.
9:06 pm
and the response from republican leadership, quote, president obama's latest plan should be met with justifiable skepticism. why? these are your ideas. that's one thing if you're not sort of down with the business tax cuts and down with the business tax cuts specifically on investing in equipment but when that's been your idea, why justifiable skepticism? it's your idea. there are two possible things going on here. one is that president obama somehow thinks that republicans are going to be uncraven enough this year to actually vote for things they say they're for. like tax cuts for businesses. if you listen to president obama these days, though, he does not sound like he's being that naive about that. >> even on things we usually agree on they say, no. if i said the sky was blue they'd say no.
9:07 pm
if i said fish live in the sea, they'd say no. >> i think the president has now been disabused of any notion that republicans might vote for their own policies. even if he proposes them. the other possibility about what's going on here is that this tactic, what president obama has started doing now in this new campaign season, is about showing, demonstrating that republican cravenness, showing that republicans will reject and denounce their own ideas. they'll even denounce corporate tax cuts if obama is for them. >> if i said the sky was blue, they'd say no. if i said fish live in the sea, they'd say no. >> it seems like he gets it. they'd say no. they'd say no. they. they. the case he is making to that crowd in milwaukee is about they. right? it's about republicans. republicans being crazy extreme in their opposition to him. and you know who that kind of an
9:08 pm
argument resonates with? you know who that kind of an argument gets big smiles and big laufter and spontaneous applause from a crowd? you know who that argument works for, who that argument motivates in an election season, fires up and gets ready to go? the democratic base. the progressive base of the democratic party. remember them? >> i want to say, thank you to the milwaukee area labor council and all of my brothers and sisters in the afl-cio for inviting me to spend this day with you. >> thank you afl-cio. thank you labor roots of the democratic base. the most important national dynamic heading into this year's elections is the economy. the most important political dynamic is the yawning chasm that is the enthusiasm gap between the republican base, they're highly motivated, and the democratic base which hasn't really been motivated at all. apparently democrats in the white house are ready to start
9:09 pm
working on that, finally. they've got eight weeks from today. tick-to being, tick-tock. joining us is ezra klein staff writer for "the washington post" and msnbc contributor. thanks for being here. >> good evening. >> policiwise, what is president obama proposing this week that is so offensive to republican ideology? >> i spent some time with this today. we have one tax cut that is meant to give businesses hundreds of billions of dollars to invest in equipment, another one meant to give businesses hundreds of billions of dollars to do research and development. we got the small business bill, which is $30 billion for small businesses to get money lent to them. and then we have the infrastructure bill which will be about $50 billion, which will be end up leveraged and multiplied. so states and local governments can pay private businesses to build things for them. so this is a pretty business friendly package of proposals here. they're not that big. a lot of them as you pointed out in your intro were based on republican proposals from the beginning. but the problem is that they are now coming from a democratic president and as you point out
9:10 pm
we are eight weeks before the election. the problem republicans have with this is not ideological. it's fundamentally electoral. >> house minority leader john boehner responded to these proposals by saying this. he said, they don't address the two big problems that are hurting our economy -- excessive government spending, and the uncertainty that washington democrats policies are creating for small businesses. i hear you that it is an electoral argument they're making against these policies, not an ideological one. but i don't understand, honestly, the case he is making. what is this uncertainty argument? >> i really have tried to track this one down. i've been like mario looking for the princess. and you get, whenever you talk to any business guy about uncertainty here is what they end up telling you. what i would like is if the government were more certain to do the exact policies i would like them to do. so i spoke with folks from ge. they said what they needed to invest in nuclear energy was an energy bill like the one the democrats wanted to do and the republicans blocked. others would like tax cuts for
9:11 pm
them, certainly the business community would love to have the r&d tax credit expanded and made permanent. that is a major source of uncertainty. we tend to let it expire every year. and then of course there is the question of government spending which boehner also brought up. if you are a grocery store near a school and teachers shop there the uncertainty you're worried about is that the state will fire the teachers and they won't shop there. you go on and on and on down the line like that. the biggest uncertainty businesses are facing bar none is that they will not have customers. so things that the government does, which allow them either to have the money to do the things they need to do or customers to pay the money to help them do the things they need to do to hire and expand, that reduces their uncertainty. again what republicans are worried about is less certainty about winning the election and that comes if they say president obama has heard the message of the voeters or our message, reach across the aisle and have some pretty good ideas here. that isn't a winning message for the opposition party going into an election. >> let me ask you about one other specific policy angle on what the president is proposing.
9:12 pm
i am open about the fact that i love infrastructure because i hate bad infrastructure and i think it makes sense economically and from a national strength and resilience point of view to invest in infrastructure but what is this infrastructure bank idea that president obama is now talking about? what's the bank? >> so, infrastructure is beset by a couple problems right? if it is a one state, if we have an infrastructure project that is going to be for southwestern states it is a little hard for california and arizona and a couple others to get together and do it. we also don't have a great way of doing infrastructure in congress. the bills don't come up very often. we wait for stimulus measures. they go into earmarks. the infrastructure bank would be a bank with politically appointed and then insulated appointees so they'd be appointed and confirmed by senate, sit for a couple years, couldn't take them out that easily. they would get seed money maybe $50 billion in this case which they could then use to leverage up and they could then make loans to good projects. it would be a way of speeding this along and prioritizing them effectively. >> ezra klein staff writer for
9:13 pm
"the washington post" and msnbc contributor and very good explainer of complicated things. thanks very much for your time tonight. >> thank you. okay. it is an issue that has led to many a sunday school threat that an angry god will strike you blind. or make you grow hair on your palms. it is an issue that is very difficult for a person who blushes easily to discuss on television without the help of extra heavy duty makeup. but it is an issue that is becoming unavoidable in one high profile race for the united states senate this year so we shall endeavor to discuss it in a moment and when it is done we shall be relieved. not like that. sorry. ♪ ...honor... ♪ ...and trust. an unspoken bond that, while common among men... ♪ exceedingly rare among companies.
9:14 pm
the ram 60-day handshake. ram.
9:15 pm
you know that expression the enemy of my enemy is my friend? in arizona this year that could be changed to the enemy of my enemy is in total fraud. dirty tricks, specious third party candidates all ahead. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 what if every atm was free?
9:16 pm
tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no more $2, $3 fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no more paying to access your own money. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 it'd be like every atm in the world was your atm. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 the schwab bank high yield investor checking(tm) account. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 zero atm fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 a great interest rate. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no minimums. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 the biggest thing in checking since checks. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 open an account at 1-800-4schwab or
9:17 pm
when i was growing up in california i played a lot of sports. i know. insert gay joke here. there is a political point. hold on. i started as a very young kid playing lots of sports, basketball and soccer and i am not proud of this but i was sort of a rough player. i think i compensated for not being a great player by having greatly sharp elbows. i probably fouled out of more high school basketball games than i managed to stay in. but there was one rule i always remembered, one rule we all remembered because it's just about the first thing you learn in kids' sports. after the game when you're done trying to knock it out of each other while your parents cringe you are supposed to line up and
9:18 pm
shake hands and say good game and wish your opponent well. that's the way it is supposed to go in kids' sports, adult sports, and in life generally. especially the parts of life that are often really analogous to sports, things like electoral politics. but apparently this year a lot of candidates on one side of the aisle were hiding out in the minivan when their coaches were trying to teach them the whole shake hands sportsmanship lesson. a surprising number of republicans who have lost in primary elections this year are refusing to go along with the campaign version of shaking hands. the dreaded unity rally. where all the candidates from the same party endorse whoever won the primary so the whole party will be unified for the general election. last week we reported after senator mccain beat j.d. hayworth in arizona's republican primary for senate mr. hayworth not only did not endorse senator mccain he did not show up at the supposed unity rally. then senator mccain's people kept attacking j.d. hayworth at that supposedly unifying event.
9:19 pm
same deal happened in florida where rick scott beat bill mccollum in the republican primary for governor. bill mccollum not only did not endorse rick scott but told reporters he still thought mr. scott was dishonest. in florida they canceled the unity rally rather than put on a sham one. in nevada, miss louden refused to endorse ms. angle and she skipped the unity event there as well. after we reported those stories last week the website think progress found a bunch of other examples of the same phenomenon. in washington's senate primary the defeated tea party republican refusing to endorse the republican nominee. in missouri the tea party candidate refusing to endorse the republican who won the senate primary. it was either no endorsement or skipping the unity rally for losing republican candidates for congress in south carolina, washington, pennsylvania, indiana, and kansas. also in the governor's races in iowa and in south carolina. it turns out that what we have
9:20 pm
spotted is not just a trend. it is almost the new normal. tea party favorite clint didier lost the senate primary in washington to dino rossy. he is still withholding his endorsement and now tells us, quote, i want him to win in the worst way. it's not that i wouldn't endorse him. i will endorse him but he has to try and reach out to my voters. didier also insists mr. rossi adopt mr. didier's positions because, hey, when you want your opponent to win in the worst possible way, you should first saddle him with your losing agenda that couldn't even get you through the primary. but at least mr. didier is offering to shake hands if he gets what he wants. in alaska soon to be former senator lisa murkowski has decided not only is she not going to shake hands, she is not even going to quit playing. lisa murkowski lost in the republican primary to a tea party backed candidate named joe miller. lisa murkowski pointedly did not endorse mr. miller. now senator murkowski has told
9:21 pm
the associated press that despite losing that primary she is not a quitter and that she is, quote, still in this game. it appears senator murkowski is testing the idea of running against joe miller again. this time perhaps on the state's libertarian party line. supporters of senator murkowski reportedly met with officials from alaska's libertarian party over the weekend to ask about the possibility of her becoming the libertarian candidate. the libertarian chairman later telling the anchorage paper that senator murkowski might as well try to climb mount mckinley. get out the ice axes. the ap now reporting that alaska's current libertarian candidate sat down today with senator murkowski to talk things over. he sounds like he may be open to giving up his spot on the ballot if he told the alaska dispatch alaska's senior republican senator essentially agrees to become its libertarian senior senator, quote, with sincerity he said and for real.
9:22 pm
trying to understand what that might mean to mr. hosi i spent some quality time today with his campaign website which is david for honestly i'm still not sure exactly what a lisa murkowski conversion to for real libertarianism might mean for david hosi. i can tell you he says on his website that he has, quote, hunted caribou and observed their determination. we will all be observing david for alaska's determination to stay in this race in the days ahead. as well as the beltway media's determination to not report on all of these major republican candidates openly hating on each other eight weeks before the election despite all the evidence that they are since that sort of story spoils the fact free election year narrative about how great things are going this year for the unified on the march gop. - but you can still see him. - you just said he was in-- - copenhagen. - come on. - that's pretty far. - doc, look who's in town. - ellen! - copenhagen? - cool, right? vacation. - but still seeing patients. ( whispers ) workaholic. - i heard that.
9:23 pm
- she said it. - i-- cisco-- introducing healthpresence. when pain keeps you up, nothing is proven to help you fall asleep faster than advil pm liqui-gels. rushing real liquid relief to ease you to sleep fast. for nighttime pain, make advil pm your #1 choice. but what we can do
9:24 pm
is arm ourselves for the ones we love with a flu shot from walgreens. ♪ [ coughs ] [ female announcer ] with the most pharmacists certified to immunize... [ sneezes ] ...and walk-ins welcome everyday, we're making it easy for everyone to get their flu shot, no matter how small their motivation may be. ♪ so stop by and get your flu shot today at walgreens. there's a way to stay well. [ air whooshing ] [ crunch! ] [ male announcer ] 11 grams of delicious whole grain. one mighty toasted crunch. new wheat thins crunch stix. the crunch is calling.
9:25 pm
9:26 pm
as we have been talking about on this show recently there is a little remarked upon epidemic of sore loserism in this year's elections. candidates who lose republican primaries but who can't accept that they lost, who refuse to congratulate or endorse the candidates who beat them. in addition, though, to the sore loser phenomenon, we are also witnessing this year republican candidates who simply freak out other republicans. in louisiana, for example, governor bobby jindal has found himself unable to endorse senator david vitter the hooker guy in the senator's bid for re-election. in colorado there is dan maze, the amazing republican nominee for governor who claimed falsely
9:27 pm
that he was once a secret agent in kansas. now the republican party in colorado wants dan maze to less than secretly drop out of the race. even ken buck the quite out there himself tea party endorsed republican candidate for senate in colorado has withdrawn his support for mr. maze. but the most extreme case of republicans being freaked out by one of their own appears to be happening in the great state of delaware. the primary is one week from today. and christine o'donnell with the backing of the tea party is taking her second stab at the united states senate. to get to the general election though first she must defeat mike castle a long-time republican congressman and former governor of the state. he is the choice of the gop establishment. he has never lost an election in his very long political career. a tea party group that invested heavily in joe miller's far right campaign against lisa murkowski in alaska is now supporting christine o'donnell in delaware. in any normal year mr. castle would be a shoe-in to win the primary but this is the year
9:28 pm
that not only brought us, mr. miller over ms. murkowski in alaska, it also brought us rand paul in kentucky and sharron angle in nevada and more. candidates who would be human interest stories in any normal election year who this year are beating establishment republicans in primaries all over the country. and so christine o'donnell and her long history of campaigning against things that don't usually get discussed on cable news now must be discussed on cable news. in her former job describing herself as the president and founder of the savior's alliance for lifting the truth, christine o'donnell told an mtv interviewer that conservatives crusading for abstinence were not going far enough. it is not enough to be abs tin ent with other people. you also have to be abstinnent alone. quote, the bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery so you can't -- a word that rhymes with congratulate --
9:29 pm
without lust. as interesting as ms. o'donnell's opinions are on how people congratulate themselves, it is a november, 1998 article o'donnell wrote called "the case for chastity" in which she began, quote, adolph hitler once said to engineer a society you must first engineer its language. we can see the unfolding of that in our society. society's sexual liberation has unleashed an entirely new lexicon. for example gay has always meant joyful or gleeful. until the homosexuals got ahold of that word, like hitler did. finally, there is what christine o'donnell has said about herself, about her past run for the u.s. senate, some claims that don't add up. last thursday those claims caught up with her in a disastrous interview with a conservative radio host back in her home state. >> when you were speaking at an out of state group recently and you told them that you won two out of three counties in
9:30 pm
delaware, what did you mean? >> i don't think i ever said i won two out of three counties but i -- >> let's listen to the audio. hold on one second. i have the audio right here. >> i was a 2008 endorsed candidate against joe biden and i won in two counties. i didn't have the support of our liberal republicans then. >> you said you won in two counties. >> you know what? that probably was, you're on the campaign trail a lot. i meant tied. um -- >> well, you didn't tie. >> you have a tracker following you waiting for you to trip up. >> yeah, but you didn't -- christine, i'm just saying -- you didn't tie him either. >> oh, absolutely i did. >> no she didn't. she really didn't. didn't. it's a fact. didn't. ms. o'donnell isn't a new candidate. she ran and lost against democrat joe biden two years ago. but extreme views that did not even make the national radar then are precisely the kind of views that have gotten other republican candidates the nomination this election cycle. many of them destined to become united states senators in
9:31 pm
january. and their fellow republicans in some cases are freaking out about it. joining us now is a senior reporter for talking points memo who has been bringing a story of this race and this remarkable candidate to a national audience. thanks very much for joining us. >> thanks, rachel. >> have i missed anything about christine o'donnell that republicans are worried about in terms of her as a potential nominee? >> well, yes. actually, there are a few things. you haven't missed them but we haven't mentioned them here. her college education has been an issue. this is sort of a come up in recent stories in the last few days but also her finances. she is still paying off debt from the 2008 campaign and there are some questions about the way that she is raising money from her supporters and some of that is going to pay off that debt. and then also looking at sort of her own personal finances and what she has paid the irs and republicans have sort of quietly been making this an issue for a few weeks as they've worried she might actually beat mike castle. >> did she also tell "the weekly standard" she gets home every
9:32 pm
night and has staffers look through her bushes? >> yes, i am not sure if that was the exact quote but she essentially said people have been following her home and there are people looking in the bushes and she needs people to check that and that is a conservative publication, a friendly publication. a lot of republicans are pointing to that saying what's going on? you also had a supporter of o'donnell's sort of questioning mike castle's sexuality. o'donnell distanced herself from that but also repeated the allegations several times in press releases and in subsequent interviews. so there's definitely a lot going on there and national republicans are worried she is not ready for primetime. >> well, how realistic are her chances? i mean obviously in a normal election year she would be the kind of candidate that she was the last time that she ran in which case she was beaten rather soundly by joe biden. this is not a a normal election year. >> right. well, delaware has historically been a blue state, you know, in national elections. joe biden held that seat for decades. mike castle has been elected for decades in part because he earned the votes from
9:33 pm
independents and from democrats who respected his record. he had a pretty moderate record as a republican. this is a closed primary. you have to be a registered republican to vote. i've had my sources in the state telling me there could be as few as 50,000 voters coming out on tuesday. that is far less than came out in alaska's primary for example and this is the state that's not necessarily used to having competitive republican primaries so really anything can happen. you throw in the tea party endorsement of her, o'donnell has been courting sarah palin hoping for an endorsement there that could come in the next six days and everybody is spending a lot of money in a state not used to seeing competitive advertising. definitely anything could happen. >> senior reporter for talking points memo which has been doing a great job on this race and with this candidate thanks very much for joining us. >> thanks. have a great night. so the republican party chairman michael steele has found a way to kick off the campaign season today with a very expensive means of keeping himself totally out of the way and totally in the news at the same time. as always, michael steele is
9:34 pm
amazing. it's coming up. ♪ [ female announcer ] something unexpected to the world of multigrain... taste. delicious pringles multigrain. multigrain pops with pringles. somewhere in america... there's a home by the sea powered by the wind on the plains. there's a hospital where technology has a healing touch. there's a factory giving old industries new life.
9:35 pm
and there's a train that got a whole city moving again. somewhere in america, the toughest questions are answered every day. because somewhere in america, more than sixty thousand people spend every day answering them. siemens. answers. dr. scholl's back pain relief orthotics with shockguard technology give you immediate relief that lasts all day long. dr. scholl's. visit our facebook page to save $3.
9:36 pm
♪ check the wife check the kids check your email messages ♪ check the news online ♪ check the money in the bank check the gas in the tank ♪ ♪ check the hottie walking by... ♪ ♪ ...wait that's a dude, no thanks ♪ ♪ check the new hairdo check the mic one two ♪ ♪ 'cause i'm about to drop some knowledge right on top of you ♪ ♪ you check a lot of things already why not add one more ♪ ♪ that can help your situation for sure ♪ ♪ check your credit score ♪ free-credit-score-dot-com free-credit-score ♪ ♪ you won't regret it at all vo: offer applies with enrollment in triple advantage.
9:37 pm
we learned today there are federal justice department investigations under way of at least five incidents of alleged violence or threats against muslims in this country. they include the stabbing of a new york city cab driver last month, arson at a construction site for a future mosque in murfreesboro, tennessee. another fire and graffiti at an islamic center in arlington, texas, a brick thrown into a window, and antiislam signs at a mosque in california and an incident last week in waterport, new york in which five teenagers were arrested after a son of one of the founders of a local mosque was sideswiped by a car a few days after a shotgun was fired into the air near the same mosque. today's announcement of these justice department investigations coming along side increasing statements of concern from washington over the planned actions of one tiny church in florida this weekend. the congregation is a small one in gainseville, florida that like the fred phelps funeral picketers from kansas revels in
9:38 pm
doing stuff extreme enough to attract nationwide condemnation. what this little publicity seeking extremist foundation has done now is they've declared on september 11 this year on saturday they will burn a thousand copies of the holy book of islam, the koran. why burn the koran? so that people will say the name of their congregation and their pastor on television which personally i can't stomach. general david petraeus in afghanistan this weekend expressed concern u.s. troops abroad could be targeted in retribution for a publicized koran burning. white house press secretary robert gibbs and state department spokesman p.j. crowley today echoing those concerns noting that u.s. diplomats in several countries have already reported small scale anti-american demonstrations. as the news starts to travel that in america that's where they burn the koran. joining us now for the interview is reverend dr. gaddy a baptist minister in louisiana, president of the interfaith alliance. he is also a member of the interfaith coalition on mosques
9:39 pm
and was part of the group that met with attorney general eric holder to talk about these incidents this afternoon. thanks very much for being here. >> thanks, rachel. >> can you tell me a little bit about your meeting this afternoon with the attorney general shall the subject and the outcome? >> it was a very interesting meeting, very personal meeting. we met with him to talk about ways in which there could be a legitimate partnership between religion and government, one that really works and doesn't have any exchange of money in it. we asked him to be very thoughtful in looking at people disobeying the law from the perspective of religious bias, prejudice, hatred, and to be very faithful in prosecuting those who commit hate crimes and let the american public know that we're going to, as a nation, protect people's right to worship as they please and
9:40 pm
that people who try to stand in the way of the constitution will be arrested and prosecuted. we also ask him for a high visibility from him and from the president in talking about the crisis that is developing with the rise in hatred and anger toward islam and toward muslims. we ask, also, that the justice department coordinate efforts from all cabinets on the president's staff to see that everybody in the administration was working on this particular issue. and i found him to be very attentive, very responsive in a way that was convincing. >> i'm reluctant to -- i was reluctant to talk about it in the introduction and almost reluctant to ask you now but i feel like i have to. this small extremist congregation in gainseville, florida planning to publicly
9:41 pm
burn copies of the holy koran, on the occasion of september 11, because it's september 11, did that issue come up specifically with the attorney general? did he address that? >> it did come up and i can quote him with permission. he said that the act is both ignorant and dangerous. i agree with him. i had the privilege this afternoon of being on an interview on an international network that broadcasts primarily in the middle east and i said what i wanted to and what i would say to our nation, too, as well, about that event. rachel, that is neither a patriotic act nor a religious act. i don't have the vocabulary to denounce the intent or the action going on in that church.
9:42 pm
it is dangerous for our nation abroad. it is disrespectful of our constitution. it certainly represents no religion i know and particularly christianity it doesn't represent. there is no way that should take place. >> welton, do you have any sense of why this is happening right now? i mean, there wasn't this sort of violent upsurge at least in this way, even after 9/11. do you have any sense of why it's happening now? >> right. i do. i think on the one hand, rachel, and you document it all the time, we've got a lot of people in this nation that are angry. they're not angry about islam. they're angry about the economy and the loss of jobs and all of that. and so we've had some people step in and manipulate this situation in a way to increase
9:43 pm
that anger and give people a way to focus it and the focus is on islam. look what's happening to our nation. we're losing our christian base. they're bringing in these people who are different and as different as an immoral act obviously. plus, and you know this, i'm sure, we have politicians trying to advance their own partisan careers by dividing this nation on this religious issue. it is inexcusable. >> reverend dr. welton gaddy president of the interfaith alliance member of the interfaith coalition on mosques, and my friend, happy to see you, welton. thank you very much for being here. >> you, too. bye-bye. coming up on "countdown" the noticeable absence of support from the right for general petraeus on his rebuke of the burn a koran day idea. next on this show, where in the world is michael steele on this unofficial first day of the election season? hint number one, he is not in
9:44 pm
hawaii. hint number two, he is wearing a lei, a pink one. please stay tuned. [ male announcer ] this is steven, a busy man. his day starts with his arthritis pain. that's breakfast with two pills. the morning is over, it's time for two more pills. the day marches on, back to more pills. and when he's finally home... but hang on; just two aleve can keep arthritis pain away all day with fewer pills than tylenol. this is steven, who chose aleve and 2 pills for a day free of pain. and get the all day pain relief of aleve in liquid gels.
9:45 pm
♪ can't help it, can't help it ♪ ♪ can't help it, no no no... ♪ come on. ♪ can't help it, can't help it, no no no ♪ ♪ you drive me crazy ♪ and i just can't stop myself, uh! ♪ ♪ can't help it, can't help it, can't help it. ♪
9:46 pm
during this final critical push of the mid term elections where has republican party chairman michael steele chosen to exercise his leadership? think of a place where the center of the political action is right now and then get on a plane going the other way. and then stay on that plane for a long, long time. that's where he is. that's next. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 it'd be like every atm in the world was your atm. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 the schwab bank high yield investor checking(tm) account. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 zero atm fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 a great interest rate. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no minimums. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 the biggest thing in checking since checks. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 open an account at 1-800-4schwab or
9:47 pm
9:48 pm
the political calendar has flipped over. we are past labor day. it is eight weeks out from the election. we are season. yes it gets going in fits and starts all year long but after labor day no argument. it is very clear for everybody in politics. everybody has their game face on. you see it in the president's schedule. he campaigned yesterday in milwaukee. tomorrow he is in cleveland. you see it in the light schedule and correspondingly low expectations for what congress will be able to do between now and the election because everybody is campaigning and in this particular campaign season with republican expectations as high as they have been in nearly 20 years, with more republican opportunity out there than in any other recent election, the republican party's leader, their national chairman, has embarked on his own somewhat mysterious campaign season strategy at a time when parties normally are fund raising as fast as they humanly can fund raise, at a time when parties are tri
9:49 pm
anlging, cutting off candidates who don't have a chance. when they are marshalling every available resource, every available republican headliner to help their candidates who need that last few weeks of help for the election, at the most key time for the republicans' most key election in years, the republican party's chairman michael steele has gone to guam. he just got back from puerto rico and the virgin islands. today he has gone to guam. tomorrow he is off to saipan famous for the jack abramoff lobbyist corruption scandal and also for being really far away. continental united states here, hawaii here. guam and the northern mariana islands all the way over there. that's where the chairman of the republican party is right now. you've heard of the republican party's southern strategy? this is their very, very, very, very, very far western strategy.
9:50 pm
neither the northern mariana islands nor guam nor puerto rico nor the virgin islands send voting members to congress. given that there are elections in eight weeks, congress is what you think -- you would think the republican party chairman would be focused on right now. but this isn't just any republican party chairman. this is michael steele. those little island territories might not be allowed to vote for congress, but they are allowed to vote for who gets to be chairman of the republican party. so if you are a donor to the republican party, the bad news is that eight weeks from the midterms, rnc money is being used to fly michael steele to four separate island nations that do not get to vote for a member of congress in the midterms. on the other hand, if you are a republican party donor, the good news is that eight weeks from the midterms, michael steele is in guam. you always end up with something delicious. ♪ triscuit. weave some goodness.
9:51 pm
9:52 pm
i could do the weight watchers plan entirely online. my gosh, i was a total couch potato; i think i shared a blood supply with the couch. one of the benefits of weight watchers online is that it's not only dealing with the food that i eat but it also deals with the exercise. with the iphone app, you can keep track of points. i can also journal my exercise while i'm out so that i can see what my budget for the day is. i never thought i would look like this. [ female announcer ] join now and get one month free. weight watchers online. finally, losing weight clicks. ♪ time to face the pollen that used to make me sneeze... my eyes water. but now zyrtec®, the fastest 24-hour allergy relief, comes in a liquid gel. zyrtec® liquid gels work fast, so i can love the air®.
9:53 pm
9:54 pm
allow me to introduce you to a cunning campaign strategy in the great state of arizona. this is 20-year-old street guitar player benjamin percy. hes running for a seat on the arizona corporation commission under the green party ticket. this is thomas meadows, a 27-year-old tarot card reader running for state treasurer also as a green party candidate. this is anthony goshorn. everybody calls him grandpa. he's running as a green party candidate for the state senate in arizona. this batch of free-spirited arizona green party candidates is brought to you by, according to today's "new york times" a republican political operative who freely admits that their candidacies may siphon some support from the democrats. this is a story we have seen before. in the wide, wide world of political dirty tricks, the exploitation of a third party that caters to the opposing
9:55 pm
party's base, it's a genre all its own. you might remember the third party candidacy of one ralph nader, not necessarily in 2000 but in 2004. you might also remember how at one point nearly one in ten of mr. nader's major donors just so happened to be bush/cheney donors as well. i wonder why. in 2000 republican operatives in new jersey took credit for getting a green party candidate on the ballot in the u.s. senate race to try to drain votes from democrat rush holt. they tried to do the same thing in pennsylvania, in 2006. of course, roger stone, the famous for being famous republican dirty trickster who is proud of having learned dirty trickery from the nixon administration, he pulled the third party trick on an intraparty scale in 2000. first he recruited pat buchanan to run for president. then he recruited donald trump, who relentlessly attacked mr. buchanan as having a love affair with adolf hitler before mr. trump himself got out of the race. so you got your two bookend
9:56 pm
candidates to attack and chase each other effectively neutralizing each other, all of which results in a stronger republican party, with no real third party threat. ta-da! this happens a lot. unless we change the way we vote, unless we switch to the system they call instant runoff voting or one, two, three voting or australian voting where you can say if my first choice candidate doesn't win, give my vote to my second choice candidate. unless we adopt a system like that, oh, please, third party candidates will almost always function as spoilers in our two major party system, and that creates this incredible incentive for dirty tricks. for people to use a third party as a means of siphoning off votes from the base of one of the major parties. that's why we see republicans abusing the green party ballot over and over again. this is one of those rare moments in politics where the stupid beltway media device of saying oh, it happens on both sides, it's actually true. because just as the "new york times" is highlighting this instance of third party
9:57 pm
exploitation/spoilerism in arizona involving these green party candidates, the detroit news is also reporting on what appears to be a democratic dirty tricks case. democrats having tried to qualify fake tea party candidates for the ballot in michigan. in this case it turned out that a democratic party official had notarized affidavits for half the tea party's 23 candidates in michigan, and the company used to collect signatures to get those tea party candidates on the ballot was the same firm that michigan democrats had used for stealth petition drives in the past. also it should be noted that two of the candidates recruited for this supposed tea party were born in 1990 and therefore ineligible to either hold office in the state or to drink, for that matter. so for once, the oh, this thing happens on both sides tripe is actually true. there's one important caveat here. what's the difference in the outcome again say this year's arizona green party republican dirty tricks and the michigan tea party democratic dirty tricks?
9:58 pm
well, the reason the detroit news is reporting on the tea party candidates right now is because the fake tea party people are not going to be on the ballot in michigan. the democrats' attempt at dirty tricks involving a third party line in michigan did not work. yes, and in arizona, complaints have been diligently filed by democrats and by real green party folks, but right now, as it stands, that michigan tea party with the ineligible to serve 20 year olds that was going to hurt the republicans and help the democrats, that's not going to do anything. assuming it was a democratic dirty trick, it was a big fat failure of a democratic dirty trick. why did it fail? because whoever put together the petitions to get the 20 year olds on the ballot didn't put the name of the party in 24 point font as required by law. so far, the presumed democratic dirty trick has failed and the republican dirty trick in arizona appears to have worked. if you really want to know why, it's not just about following directions about 24 point font. there's one other otherwise unimportant detail about this pair of stories that tells you all you need to know about why
9:59 pm
these sort of tricks tend to work for republicans and not for democrats. when the democratic party fingerprints were found to be all over that michigan tea party thing, the two democratic party officials seen as most responsible for the trickery, including the one who notarized all those tea party affidavits, both of those democrats lost their jobs, one resigned, the other one was fired. the democrats responsible for that bad embarrassing dirty sleazy tea party dirty trick thing in michigan resigned in shame or were kicked out by the party. their counterpart in the republican party, the guy who recruited the homeless feeblpeo the tarot guy to run under the green party to hurt democrats, that guy is not only not ashamed of what he did, he's not only not getting fired, he's got his picture in the "new york times" and has done a whole article with them in which he brags about what he's done. so yeah, everybody does dirty tricks, both sides. but one side has been teaching it so long, they're a

The Rachel Maddow Show
MSNBC September 7, 2010 9:00pm-10:00pm EDT

News/Business. (2010) New.

TOPIC FREQUENCY Us 10, Michigan 9, Alaska 9, Michael Steele 8, Arizona 8, Washington 8, Obama 6, Christine O'donnell 6, Murkowski 5, Lisa Murkowski 5, America 5, Florida 5, Joe Biden 4, Milwaukee 4, Islam 4, Delaware 4, U.s. 4, Rachel 3, Joe Miller 3, Mccain 3
Network MSNBC
Duration 01:00:00
Video Codec mpeg2video
Audio Cocec mp2
Pixel width 720
Pixel height 480
Sponsor Internet Archive
Audio/Visual sound, color

disc Borrow a DVD of this show
info Stream Only
Uploaded by
TV Archive
on 10/6/2011